Key Health Data for the West Midlands 2004 CHAPTER FIVE: PERINATAL MORTALITY AND SOCIAL DEPRIVATION: WEST MIDLANDS TRENDS 1998 - 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main Body |
5.1 IntroductionIn a previous chapter in Key Health Data (Key Health Data for the West Midlands 2001), we have shown that
The purpose of this chapter is to
The analysis presented here refers to the whole of the West Midlands. Sub-analyses for the three strategic health authorities are presented on www.perinatal.nhs.uk/pnm/trends. For PCTs, there are limitations on the detail in which potentially identifiable data can be published on the web or in print. The results for each PCT are therefore being sent directly to the respective director of Public Health, in line with data protection and confidentiality guidelines. 5.2 MethodsDefinitions:Stillbirth rate Early neonatal mortality rate Neonatal mortality rate Postneonatal mortality rate Perinatal mortality rate Infant mortality rate 5.3 Data sourceThe data was derived from Rapid Report Forms submitted to the Institute from maternity units in the West Midlands and the ONS Birth Tapes. 5.4 ClassificationThe two classifications in this report are listed in Tables 5.1 A and 5.1 B. They map to those applied by ONS in terms of the chronology of the event. However, they also use a previously developed categorisation which aims to elucidate underlying conditions or causality.
The standard classifications such as Wigglesworth are summarised in the CESDI national reports. However, most of these result in a large ‘unexplained’ category which confirms the need to improve the classification system (CESDI 2001). The Perinatal Institute developed a classification for stillbirth, ReCoDe (http://www.perinatal.nhs.uk/pnm/recode). For the purpose of this aggregated analysis, stillbirth rates are summarised in the following ReCoDe categories:
This was based on the Fetal and Neonatal Classification (Hey 1986) and amended to include cot deaths as a separate category.
5.5 Deprivation ScoresFor the purpose of the current analysis, we applied the widely used Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD2000). This is a ward-based measure with seven sub domains (income, employment, health, education, housing and services, environment and crime). Larger values indicate higher degrees of deprivation. For comparative analysis, we defined as cut-off the 197 (8%) most deprived wards of the 798 wards in the West Midlands. These wards had 93,962 of the total of 377,744 births (25%) over the period of the study. We thus compared the 25% of births from the 8% most deprived wards (‘IMD 8/25’) with 75% of births from the remaining 92% of the wards in the West Midlands (‘IMD 92/75’). It should be noted that these births, although from the most deprived wards, were still from a range of social class strata, a consequence of this measure of inequality being ward and not patient based. We currently do not have social class indicators for each birth in the West Midlands, although we expect data from the ONS which will allow us to use these for further analysis in the near future. 5.6 Rates and Trends in Perinatal and Infant Mortality
The PSA targets on reducing inequalities use infant mortality as a key indicator (Health Inequalities DoH 2004). However, as Figure 5.1 shows,
It is well established that many instances of adverse outcome have antenatal origins. Therefore, we need to include stillbirths, not just in their own right, but also when seeking to understand and reduce infant mortality. The analysis presented in this chapter will include perinatal (stillbirth and early neonatal) as well as infant (early, late and post neonatal) data.
There was a non-significant increase in perinatal mortality in England & Wales (p=0.11; linear trend analysis) and West Midlands (p=0.21) This appears to be associated with a rise in stillbirth rates over the last 2 years (Figure 5.3).
Linear trend analysis shows an increase in stillbirth rates in the West Midlands over the last two years, which mirrored those in England and Wales over the same period. Both were significant (p<0.01).
Consistent with national statistics (CESDI 2001), the Wigglesworth classification used by CESDI / CEMACH leaves consistently two-thirds of stillbirths in the ‘Unexplained’ Category.
Fetal growth restriction was the main category in each year, and represented an average 42% of all stillbirths. There was a slight, non-significant downward trend (p=0.65). Early Neonatal Deaths showed a gradual downward trend in England and Wales (p=0.02) but not in the West Midlands. There was a significant upward trend in the category Severe Pulmonary Immaturity (p=0.04), while the late drop in congenital anomalies did not reach significance (p=0.22). 5.7 Neonatal Deaths and Gestational AgeWhile stillbirths are recorded from 24 weeks only, neonatal deaths have no lower gestational age limit, and a baby is considered live born if it has demonstrated any signs of life. The deaths classified as ‘Severe Pulmonary Immaturity’ were analysed according to gestational age at birth (Table 5.8)
The table shows an increase in deaths reported at very early gestations. The increasing trend in reports of ENND at gestations < 22 wks is highly significant (p<0.01). This is further illustrated in Figure 5.8.
The Perinatal Institute intends to discuss the issue of gestational age and the recording of neonatal deaths with regional stakeholders. One possible explanation for the observed rise the tendency in recent years to move the management of late miscarriages from a gynaecological to an obstetric ward, where perhaps ‘signs of life’ are more actively looked for, even at pre-viable gestations.
There was a gradual drop in late neonatal death rates in England and Wales, (p=0.01) which was not reflected in the West Midlands data.
It should be noted that numbers in the 'Late Neonatal' age range are much smaller, which explains some of the variation. The downward trend in congenital anomalies was statistically significant (p=0.04) but the drop in 2003 was accompanied by an increase in the unclassified/unknown category, which is likely due to delays in diagnosis and classifications of some anomalies. There appears to be a slow downward trend in both data series. This achieves significance in the figures for England and Wales (p<0.01) but not in the West Midlands (p=0.38). There was a significant drop in cot deaths (p<0.01) The apparent downward trend in congenital anomalies is not statistically significant (p=0.56).
There was a downward trend in infant mortality rates in England and Wales (p<0.01) which was not reflected in the West Midlands. Table 5.14 and Figure 5.14 show an analysis of Infant deaths by the Neonatal and Infant classification.
The two largest categories are 'severe pulmonary immaturity' and 'congenital anomalies'. There was a fall in cot deaths (p<0.01). The apparent late drop of congenital anomaly related deaths did not reach statistical significance (p=0.39). 5.8 Stillbirth and Infant Mortality and DeprivationTo analyse the effect of deprivation, a cut–off was selected which identified the 8% most deprived wards in the West Midlands, which accounted for 25% of all births (IMD 8/25). This is used to compare with the other 92% of wards, representing 75% of births (IMD 92/75).
This analysis shows the well known association between deprivation and stillbirths. However, it is also apparent that the gap is not reducing but in fact getting larger, due to a significant increase in stillbirths for the most deprived areas from 6.9 in 1998 to 8.4 in 2003 (p=0.04).
This analysis confirms the well known association between deprivation and infant mortality. There is no decrease in the size of the gap between the most deprived and others. There was even a mild but nonsignificant (p=0.34) increase in infant deaths in the most deprived areas. 5.9 Summary Conclusions
ReferencesHealth Inequalities: Life Expectancy and Infant Mortality DoH, 2004 Hey EN, LLoyd DJ, Wigglesworth JS. Classifying perinatal death: fetal and neonatal factors. British Journal Obstetrics & Gynaecology 1986;93:1213-1223. Key Health Data for the West Midlands 2001. University of Birmingham DPHE 2002 Maternal and Child Health Consortium. CESDI 8th Annual Report: Confidential Enquiry of Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy, 2001. Commentary: Clinical Implications of ‘Unexplained Stillbirths’, J Gardosi, pp 40-47 ReCoDe: Stillbirth classification denoting the ‘Relevant Condition at Death’. http://www.perinatal.nhs.uk/pnm/recode accessed 7th May 2005 For more information please contact Sarafina
Cotterill on 0121 414 8117 |