West Midlands Key Health Data 2008/09 CHAPTER THREE: MEASURING ACCESS TO BREAST SCREENING SERVICES, COLPOSCOPY AND GUM CLINICS Samuel Jones and Diane Edwards |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main Body 7: Environment And Health – Outdoor Air Pollution 9: Predictors Of Emergency Department Use At Neighbourhood Level In The West Midlands |
3.1 IntroductionThis chapter looks at access to a range of health services, extending work previously reported in Key Health Data¹, as well as other data sources on accessibility (such as the Core National Accessibility Indicators², CRC’s Access to Services³ and the Indices of Deprivation4) which tend to focus on local health services such as GP practices, dental practices, pharmacies and opticians. The types of service chosen for analysis are: breast screening units (all static and mobile sites), colposcopy clinics, and genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. These services are more widely dispersed throughout the region and it is therefore less likely that people would choose to walk to these services. The measure of access in this analysis is: ‘how long it takes to drive to the closest breast screening unit, colposcopy clinic and GUM clinic’. A road network within the West Midlands, based on Ordnance Survey Integrated Transport Network (ITN) Layer, has been configured with average speeds reflecting increased congestion in more dense urban areas5. Isochrone polygons (areas of equal time from a location) are produced for each type of health services. These are then used to calculate how many people live within a 5, 10, 15 or 20 minute drive of each type of service and those living more than a 20 minute drive away Counts of population are based on 2006 LSOA mid-year population estimates. Where applicable the population counts will only count those in the target population, i.e. females aged 25-64 in the cervical screening programme and females aged 50-70 in the breast screening programme. The drive times produced by the analysis assume a starting vehicle speed as that of the speed allocated to the road and does not include time taken to get in/out of a vehicle, nor does it factor for the acceleration or deceleration of a vehicle. In practice several minutes would need to be added to gain a realistic ‘door-to-door’ journey time. Some services which are close to but beyond the region boundary are included, although this has been less successful for services in Wales, where the road network is not currently licensed by Department of Health. The analysis has been performed on the following three primary care trusts in the region: Sandwell, part of the West Midlands conurbation, is a densely populated and highly urbanised area. It is one of the most deprived PCTs in the West Midlands. Warwickshire covers a large area and is recognised as consisting of a mixed proportion of urban and rural areas6. It is the least deprived PCT in the West Midlands. Herefordshire is one of the most rural and least populated counties in England covering a vast land area with a relatively small population. In terms of deprivation, whilst it performs relatively well in some domains, it performs far less well in other domains; most notably the Barriers to Housing & Services domain. These PCTs have been selected to compare access across varyingly urban and rural areas, and with contrasting socio-economic conditions: Table 3.1: Summary of selected Primary Care Trusts
(*Note: The exact age range in the breast screening programme is those aged 50 - 70. However, population statistics are only available at LSOA level for 5-year age groups. Populations are based on LSOA annual estimates, 2006.) The findings of the drive-time analysis are presented below and summarised accordingly for each health service and PCT.
3.2 GUM Clinics3.2.1 Herefordshire PCTMap 3.1: GUM Clinics drive time analysis for Herefordshire PCT
3.2.2 Sandwell PCTMap 3.2: GUM Clinics drive time analysis for Sandwell PCT
3.2.3 Warwickshire PCTMap 3.3: GUM Clinics drive time analysis for Warwickshire PCT
3.2.4 GUM Clinic SummaryThe main findings for the GUM clinic analysis are identified in the table below: Table 3.2: Summary of GUM clinic drive times analysis by population (%)
Whilst the more rural PCTs of Herefordshire and Warwickshire have noticeably greater catchments within a five-minute drive, the incremental increase in proportion of populations reduces thereafter, especially for Herefordshire. Contrastingly, Sandwell sees its catchment population increase rapidly. Both Sandwell and Warwickshire have near complete coverage within 20 minutes, whilst Herefordshire barely sees half of its population covered. 3.3 Breast Screening Units3.3.1 Herefordshire PCTMap 3.4: Breast Screening Units drive time analysis for Herefordshire PCT
3.3.2 Sandwell PCTMap 3.5: Breast Screening Units drive time analysis for Sandwell PCT
3.3.3 Warwickshire PCTMap 3.6: Breast Screening Units drive time analysis for Warwickshire PCT
3.3.4 Breast Screening Units SummaryThe main findings for the breast screening units analysis are identified in the table below: Table 3.3: Summary of breast screening units drive times analysis by population (%)
Whilst Sandwell and Warwickshire see total coverage at 15 minutes drive time (and indeed near total coverage within 10 minutes), Herefordshire is unable to gain complete coverage within 20 minutes, with a small proportion of women residing more than 20 minutes from their nearest breast screening unit. 3.4 Colposcopy Clinics3.4.1 Herefordshire PCTMap 3.7: Colposcopy clinics drive time analysis for Herefordshire PCT
3.4.2 Sandwell PCTMap 3.8: Colposcopy clinics drive time analysis for Sandwell PCT
3.4.3 Warwickshire PCTMap 3.9: Colposcopy clinics drive time analysis for Warwickshire PCT
3.4.4 Colposcopy SummaryThe main findings for the colposcopy clinics analysis are identified in the table below: Table 3.4: Summary of breast screening units drive times analysis
Sandwell and Warwickshire again are shown to have the greatest coverage, with near total coverage of the target population within 20 minutes. 3.5 Summary and ConclusionsThe analysis has shown that there are variations in drive times to health services according to type of health service and the PCTs in this analysis. Figure 3.1, below, summarises the proportions of populations of the three PCTs within a 10 and 20 minute of each of the services: Figure 3.1: Summary of PCTs to all services: populations (%) within 10 and 20 minute drive times
In terms of health services, the breast screening units have complete coverage within a 20-minute drive, with the exception of Herefordshire, which is just short of this. All PCTs have relatively high proportions within 10 minutes. The pattern for GUM and colposcopy clinics is almost identical where there is almost complete coverage within 20 minutes for both Sandwell and Warwickshire, but Herefordshire has only half of its population covered within 20 minutes. Sandwell and Herefordshire both experience similar proportions, under half their populations, within a 10-minute drive. Herefordshire, the most rural of PCTs in the analysis, is the only PCT not to have full coverage of its population for any service within 20 minutes. The rural nature of the PCT combined with its dispersed population and fewer services perhaps makes this inevitable. It is interesting, however, to see that in Herefordshire the catchment for those within 5 minutes is often considerably more than that of Sandwell and comparable when within 10 minutes. This suggests that those living within the main towns are covered well, but there remain isolated communities. The isochrone polygons generated in Sandwell are much smaller in area, and this can be seen as a direct effect of urban traffic congestion affecting travel times. Despite this, Sandwell still sees the majority of its population are within 15 minutes drive of the services investigated. Warwickshire has overall seen a very good coverage of its population for all the services analysed, with over half of its population covered within 10 minutes for all the services. This is perhaps due to the presence of a high number of services across a large area combined with the large towns (such as Nuneaton, Warwick, Bedworth, Leamington Spa) and also its proximity to Coventry. In terms of deprivation some of the results found in this analysis may not be too robust due to the relative low levels of deprivation in Herefordshire and Warwickshire, however the analysis does suggest that there is a greater proportion of the most deprived group within shorter drive times to health services: Figure 3.2: Summary of PCTs to all services by deprivation: populations (%) within 10 minute drive times
This is most likely due to the fact that, generally speaking, there are higher levels of deprivation found in urban areas and more services are located in urban centres. Further analysis in Birmingham has also shown that the most deprived group are within shorter journey times compared to the least deprived group. Such analysis can not only help identify gaps in services provision but help assist in scenario planning and in helping health services better target their intended population groups. Reduced journey times for patients to health services may not just help increase attendance but may also help contribute toward a reduced carbon footprint. References:
For more information please contact Sarafina
Cotterill |